Cuts to the Royal Marines Would Impact UK Security

Posted on February 4, 2018

Royal Marines Cuts Would ‘Undermine’ UK Security, MPs Warn

Cuts to the Royal Marines and the ability to carry out amphibious operations would significantly undermine the UK’s security, MPs have warned in a strongly-worded report.

The history of the Royal Marines must not be sacrificed to the demands of “Treasury bookkeeping”, the Defence Select Committee said in response to speculation that amphibious capabilities could be slashed in a Whitehall review.

Speculation about the loss of 1,000 marines and a threat to the Royal Navy’s two Albion-class amphibious assault ships came amid the National Security Capability Review (NSCR).

The defence element of the review has now been separated out, in what was seen as a victory for Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson, and the MPs used their report to warn against cuts.

“Given the disproportionate contribution the Royal Marines make to defence and the sheer range and versatility of their military skills, both they and the country’s security would be significantly undermined,” the report said.

The MPs added: “After more than three and a half centuries of service to the nation, Her Majesty’s Corps of Royal Marines is in danger of being sacrificed to short-term Treasury bookkeeping.”

Marine morale had already been hit and training curtailed, the MPs noted, adding it was a “particular embarrassment” that joint exercises with allies had been affected.

They also hit out at the reported threat to HMS Albion and HMS Bulwark, warning their capabilities could not be replaced by the new aircraft carriers or other warships.

“Disposing of our amphibious capability would not only put the interests of this country at serious risk, but would also be a drastic waste of tailor-made vessels, expensively refitted for another 15 years’ use, and of a military specialism that has been fostered across all three services,” they said.

The helicopter carrier HMS Ocean, another key part of the Royal Navy’s amphibious capability, is already set to leave the service and is a “serious loss”, the MPs said.

Defence Select Committee chairman Julian Lewis said: “In January, we were told that the Albion and Bulwark were not due to leave service until 2033 and 2034 respectively.

“That such irreplaceable ships are in line for deletion 15 years early demonstrates, yet again, the desperate inadequacy of the defence budget.

“We must reinstate a target of around 3% of GDP, the percentage which we spent right up to the mid-1990s, long after the ‘peace dividend’ cuts at the end of the Cold War had been made.

“Gavin Williamson deserves credit for seizing back control of the defence dimension of the NSCR process; but, ultimately, he will fail without extra funding from the Treasury.

“Unless he secures this, the Royal Marines will be reduced to a level far below the critical mass needed to sustain them as a high-readiness commando force. “

In response to the report, a Ministry of Defence spokesperson said:

“Protecting the UK will always be our priority and the Royal Marines play a vital role in defending our country.

“Just last week we launched the Modernising Defence Programme to strengthen our Armed Forces in the face of intensifying threats.

“Our brand new aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, is central to our efforts to build an Armed Forces fit for the future and is a symbol of our intent to remain a truly Global Britain.”

Forces Network >

Have your say on this...

POLL

At what point should you start the Resettlement Process?

  • 2 years before departure? (44%, 4 Votes)
  • More than 2 years before you depart? (33%, 3 Votes)
  • Around 6 months before last day? (11%, 1 Votes)
  • 12 Months prior to departure? (11%, 1 Votes)

Total Voters: 9

Loading ... Loading ...